Skip to content
Brennan Ward · Deal Desk
← All work samples

Sample 2 of 7

“How do you do price analysis? Show me.”

Price analysis: the 35% that was really 22%

Deal: Halvorsen Energy — Expansion (fictional)

Situation

Halvorsen wants to add 40 hosts. AE Derek Olsen requested 35% off list, citing “competitive pressure.” Close date in 5 days.

What I did

Before touching the discount request, I benchmarked it:

Reference point Effective discount
Halvorsen’s current contract 22%
Segment median, Enterprise expansions, last 4 quarters 24%
Segment top quartile 31%
Requested 35%

Then I asked Derek what the competitor was actually quoting. He had a number: $48/host/month. Ours at list is $62. At 22% (their current rate) we are at $48.36. The customer’s existing rate already matches the competitor. The 35% request was a reflex, not a requirement.

Recommendation

Hold 22% on the expansion (co-term with the existing contract, same rate, clean paper). Offer one give the competitor cannot: a 90-day ramp on the 40 new hosts so Halvorsen pays for 15, then 30, then 40 as they migrate.

Result

Signed at 22% with the ramp. Derek’s deal closed on time and the account’s blended rate stayed intact for the renewal.

The worksheet I use

Use this on any discount request above segment median.

Field Value
Customer / deal
Requested discount
Current contracted rate
Segment median (last 4 quarters)
Segment top quartile
Competitor quote (verified?)
Gap to competitor at current rate
Non-price levers available term · ramp · prepay · co-term · marketplace · scope
Proposed give
Named get
Annual cost of the give
Annual value of the get
Recommendation